000 | 01322nam a2200181 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 170719b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781138914612 | ||
082 |
_a770 _bKRI |
||
100 |
_aKriebel, Sabinet T. _917786 |
||
245 | _aPhotography and Doubt | ||
260 |
_bRoutledge _aNew York _c2014 |
||
300 | _a275p | ||
500 | _aRecent decades have seen photography’s privileged relationship to the real come under question. Spurred by the postmodern critique of photography in the 1980s and the rise of digital technologies soon thereafter, scholars have been asking who and what built this understanding of the medium in the first place.Photography and Doubt reflects on this interest in photography’s referential power by discussing it in rigorously historical terms. How was the understanding of photographic realism cultivated in the first place? What do cases of staged and manipulated photography reveal about that realism’s hold on audiences across the medium’s history? Have doubts about photography’s testimonial power stimulated as much knowledge as its realism? | ||
600 |
_aHumanities and Social Science _99370 |
||
700 |
_aKriebel, Sabinet T. _eEditor _917786 |
||
700 |
_aZervigon, Andres Mario _eEditor _917787 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cLB _k770 _mKRI |
||
999 |
_c107580 _d107580 |