000			01930nam a2200181 4500
008			171208b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780670090051
082			_a342.54 _bBHU
100			_aBhushan, Prashant _920326
245			_aThe Case that Shook India: The Verdict That Led to the Emergency
260			_bPenguin Random House India Pvt. Ltd. _c2017 _aGurgaon
300			_a314p
500			_aIntroduction Part 1: Preliminary Court Proceedings 1. From Electoral Battle to Court Battle 2. The Petition 3. The PM in Court Part 2: In The High Court 4. The Petitioner's Opening Arguments 5. The Attorney-General Defends the Amendment 6. The PM's Counsel 7. The Petitioner's Rejoinder 8. The Verdict Part 3: The Repercussions 9. Rumblings after the Judgment 10. The Stay Order 11. Law? What law? Part 4: Validity of the Constitutional Amendment 12. It Destroys Democracy 13. PM Can Be above the Law 14. Amendment is Like a Firman 15. Emergency Measure or Tranquilizer? Part 5: Validity of The Election Law Amendments 16. Rules of the Game Changed Retrospectively 17. Rules Not Changed, Merely Clarified 18. Parliament Cannot Interpret the Law 19. The Supreme Court Judgment 20. Epilogue: From Court Battle to Electoral Battle Appendices 1. Testimony of Yashpal Kapoor 2. Testimony of Mrs Indira Gandhi 3. The Supreme Court Reviews the Kesavananda Bharati Case 4. Review Application against Justice Beg's Judgment 5. The Representation of People Act, 1951-Part VII, Section 123 6. The Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1974-No. 58 of 1974 7. The Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975-No. 40 of 1975 8. The Constitution (Thirty-ninth) Amendment Act, 1975
600			_aGandhi, Indira _96849
600			_aIndia - Parliament _95415
700			_aHidayatullah, M. _eForeword _920328
942			_2ddc _cLB _k342.54 _mBHU
999			_c108704 _d108704